File(s) under permanent embargo
Awkward states and regional organisations: the United Kingdom and Australia compared
journal contribution
posted on 2014-05-01, 00:00 authored by Baogang HeBaogang He, P Murray, A Warleigh-LackBoth the United Kingdom and Australia have been studied by specialists in each region rather than by comparativists. This article seeks to fill this gap by examining the regional ‘awkwardness’ of the United Kingdom and Australia comparatively. Australia and Britain are ‘awkward’ states in their respective regions – Asia and Europe. This is clear in their approaches to institutions, economic policy, security and identity. We examine comparatively the role of power, institutions, economy, domestic politics and culture to see which mix best accounts for the awkward status of these two states. Through this comparison, this article demonstrates that the so-called ‘uniqueness’ of the United Kingdom in regionalism literature is in fact a nearly ‘universal’ phenomenon, insofar as many global regions include awkward states.
History
Journal
Comparative European politicsVolume
12Issue
3Pagination
279 - 300Publisher
SpringerLocation
New York, N.Y.Publisher DOI
ISSN
1472-4790Language
engPublication classification
C Journal article; C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2014, Macmillan Publishers Ltd.Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC