Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Can markers detect contract cheating? Results from a pilot study

journal contribution
posted on 2018-01-01, 00:00 authored by Phillip DawsonPhillip Dawson, Wendy Sutherland-SmithWendy Sutherland-Smith
Contract cheating is the purchasing of custom-made university assignments with the intention of submitting them. Websites providing contract cheating services often claim this form of cheating is undetectable, and no published research has examined this claim. This paper documents a pilot study where markers were paid to mark a mixture of real student work and contract cheating assignments, to establish their accuracy at detecting contract cheating. Seven experienced markers individually blind marked the same bundle of 20 second-year psychology assignments, which included 6 that were purchased from contract cheating websites. Sensitivity analyses showed markers detected contract cheating 62% of the time. Specificity analyses showed markers correctly identified real student work 96% of the time. Our results contrast with contract cheating sites’ claims that contract cheating is undetectable. However, they should be taken with caution as they are from one course unit in one discipline.

History

Journal

Assessment and evaluation in higher education

Volume

43

Issue

2

Pagination

287 - 293

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Location

Abingdon, Eng.

ISSN

0260-2938

eISSN

1469-297X

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal article

Copyright notice

2017, Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC