Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Random Measurement Error Does Not Bias the Treatment Effect Estimate in the Regression-Discontinuity Design: I. The Case of No Interaction

journal contribution
posted on 1991-01-01, 00:00 authored by J C Cappelleri, W M K Trochim, Tom StanleyTom Stanley, C S Reichardt
A recently published Evaluation Review article (April 1990) claimed that because of random measurement error in the pretest (and the regression toward the mean that results) the estimate of the treatment effect of the regression-discontinuity (RD) design is biased A conceptual approach and a set of computer simulations are presented to arrive at the opposite conclusion: random measurement error in the pretest does not bias the estimate of the treatment effect in the RD design. This article, the first of two dealing with measurement error in the RD design, concentrates specifically on the case of no interaction between pretest and treatment on posttest. The claim that the RD effect estimate is not biased due to measurement error is in full agreement with the conclusion reached by several authors who have examined the design over the last two decades. © 1991, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

History

Journal

Evaluation Review

Volume

15

Issue

4

Pagination

395 - 419

Publisher

Sage

Location

London, England

ISSN

0193-841X

eISSN

1552-3926

Language

English

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC