File(s) under permanent embargo
Screening for type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose metabolism – the Australian experience
journal contribution
posted on 2004-02-01, 00:00 authored by S Colagiuri, Z Hussain, P Zimmet, Adrian CameronAdrian Cameron, J ShawOBJECTIVE--To assess the Australian protocol for identifying undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose metabolism.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--The Australian screening protocol recommends a stepped approach to detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes based on assessment of risk status, measurement of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in individuals at risk, and further testing according to FPG. The performance of and variations to this protocol were assessed in a population-based sample of 10,508 Australians.
RESULTS--The protocol had a sensitivity of 79.9%, specificity of 79.9%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 13.7% for detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and sensitivity of 51.9% and specificity of 86.7% for detecting impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). To achieve these diagnostic rates, 20.7% of the Australian adult population would require an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Increasing the FPG cut point to 6.1 mmol/l (110 mg/dl) or using Hb[A.sub.1c], instead of FPG to determine the need for an OGTT in people with risk factors reduced sensitivity, increased specificity and PPV, and reduced the proportion requiring an OGTT. However, each of these protocol variations substantially reduced the detection of IGT or IFG.
CONCLUSIONS--The Australian screening protocol identified one new case of diabetes for every 32 people screened, with 4 of 10 people screened requiring FPG measurement and 1 in 5 requiring an OGTT. In addition, 1 in 11 people screened had IGT or IFG. Including Hb[A.sub.1c] measurement substantially reduced both the number requiring an OGTT and the detection of IGT or IFG.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--The Australian screening protocol recommends a stepped approach to detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes based on assessment of risk status, measurement of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in individuals at risk, and further testing according to FPG. The performance of and variations to this protocol were assessed in a population-based sample of 10,508 Australians.
RESULTS--The protocol had a sensitivity of 79.9%, specificity of 79.9%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 13.7% for detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and sensitivity of 51.9% and specificity of 86.7% for detecting impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). To achieve these diagnostic rates, 20.7% of the Australian adult population would require an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Increasing the FPG cut point to 6.1 mmol/l (110 mg/dl) or using Hb[A.sub.1c], instead of FPG to determine the need for an OGTT in people with risk factors reduced sensitivity, increased specificity and PPV, and reduced the proportion requiring an OGTT. However, each of these protocol variations substantially reduced the detection of IGT or IFG.
CONCLUSIONS--The Australian screening protocol identified one new case of diabetes for every 32 people screened, with 4 of 10 people screened requiring FPG measurement and 1 in 5 requiring an OGTT. In addition, 1 in 11 people screened had IGT or IFG. Including Hb[A.sub.1c] measurement substantially reduced both the number requiring an OGTT and the detection of IGT or IFG.
History
Journal
Diabetes careVolume
27Issue
2Pagination
367 - 371Publisher
American Diabetes AssociationLocation
[Alexandria, Va.]ISSN
0149-5992eISSN
1935-5548Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2004, American Diabetes AssociationUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC