File(s) under permanent embargo
State-media consensus on going to war? Australian newspapers, political elites, and fighting the Islamic State
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-01, 00:00 authored by Peter Mulherin, Benjamin IsakhanBenjamin IsakhanThis article assesses the link between the state and the media in their coverage of foreign policy decisions. It holds up to empirical scrutiny the claim that genuine press criticism can only occur within the bounds of political-elite debate. Taking the Australian government’s 2014 decision to fight the Islamic State as its case study, it explores areas of consensus and dissensus between political discourse and the media. Conducting a qualitative analysis of three media frames used by major newspapers,
it tests the “indexing hypothesis” and concludes that some press coverage went beyond the parameters of political-elite debate. This finding of independent criticism has implications beyond the present case study, as it helps us better understand the role of the media in democracies—specifically, holding governments to account when sending their nations to war.
it tests the “indexing hypothesis” and concludes that some press coverage went beyond the parameters of political-elite debate. This finding of independent criticism has implications beyond the present case study, as it helps us better understand the role of the media in democracies—specifically, holding governments to account when sending their nations to war.
History
Journal
International journal of press/politicsVolume
24Issue
4Pagination
531 - 550Publisher
SAGE PublicationsLocation
London, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
1940-1612Language
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2019, The Author(s)Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC