File(s) under permanent embargo
The effects of recalling generic versus episodic information first on adults' reports of a repeated event
journal contribution
posted on 2022-03-01, 00:00 authored by Meaghan DanbyMeaghan Danby, Stefanie SharmanStefanie Sharman, G ClaringboldWitnesses reporting repeated crimes—like family violence—must report detailed information about individual incidents. Previously, recalling generic information about a repeated event before individual episodes has helped children report more information overall. The current study examined whether adults would also benefit from recalling generic event information first. Seventy-eight adults completed four activity sessions and were later interviewed about them. All interviews included a generic phase where participants were prompted to recall what usually happens, and an episodic phase where they recalled two individual episodes of the activities. Participants were randomly assigned to receive the generic (n = 38) or the episodic phase first (n = 40). During the generic phase, the generic-first participants reported more details. However, when reporting the second individual episode, episodic-first participants reported more details. Findings suggest mild benefits from describing generic event information first, but potential detrimental impacts on subsequent episodic reports are discussed.
History
Journal
Applied Cognitive PsychologyVolume
36Issue
2Article number
acp.3924Pagination
460 - 467Publisher
WileyLocation
London, EnglandPublisher DOI
ISSN
0888-4080eISSN
1099-0720Publication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC