Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

What is the best measure for assessing diabetes distress? A comparison of the problem areas in diabetes and diabetes distress scale: results from Diabetes MILES-Australia

journal contribution
posted on 2018-04-01, 00:00 authored by E K Fenwick, G Rees, Elizabeth Holmes-TruscottElizabeth Holmes-Truscott, J L Browne, F Pouwer, Jane SpeightJane Speight
This study used Rasch analysis to examine the psychometric validity of the Diabetes Distress Scale and the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale to assess diabetes distress in 3338 adults with diabetes (1609 completed the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (n = 675 type 1 diabetes; n = 934 type 2 diabetes) and 1705 completed the Diabetes Distress Scale (n = 693 type 1 diabetes; n = 1012 type 2 diabetes)). While criterion and convergent validity were good, Rasch analysis revealed suboptimal precision and targeting, and item misfit. Unresolvable multidimensionality within the Diabetes Distress Scale suggests a total score should be avoided, while suboptimal precision suggests that the Physician-related and Interpersonal distress subscales should be used cautiously.

History

Journal

Journal of health psychology

Volume

23

Issue

5

Pagination

667 - 680

Publisher

Sage

Location

London, Eng.

ISSN

1359-1053

eISSN

1461-7277

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2016, The Authors